Business
People pack Seattle City Hall in June, 2017 for a meeting about whether to enact an income tax.
Enlarge Icon
People pack Seattle City Hall in June, 2017 for a meeting about whether to enact an income tax.
Credit: KUOW Photo/Kate Walters

Why Washington ranks as the worst state for poor residents

Washington ranks as the worst state for low-income earners to live, and it's notably worse than any other state.

The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) places Washington, Texas and Florida at the top of the "terrible 10" list in its annual report. The institute says these have the most regressive tax systems, in which poor residents pay much higher shares in taxes than the wealthiest.

The non-profit, non-partisan institute gathered data from the IRS, state tax departments and various federal agencies that collect tax revenue.

The divide between rich and poor


The state's wealthiest households spend about 3 percent of their income on taxes. By contrast, the poorest families spend 17.8 percent. It's a far larger gap than any other state. In Texas, for example, it's 3 percent for wealthy households, and 13 percent of the family income in the poorest households.

Seattle economist Dick Conway, a longtime critic of Washington state's regressive tax system, breaks it down this way: "The fact that the lowest income families have to work 9.2 weeks out of the year just to pay their tax bill, and the top one percent only have to work 1.6 weeks out of the year, that's just shameful."

Conway advocates for an income tax - though efforts to enact one statewide in Washington have never gained traction.

Washington relies on people consuming


More than 60 percent of Washington state's tax base comes from sales and excise taxes. Those hit poorer residents the hardest, since they're paying the same tax on an item that a higher income person does.

ITEP says that reliance on regressive taxes — and the lack of an income tax — is what lands Washington at the top worst. The average state reliance on consumption taxes is 35 percent, according to the report.

No one knows how much they pay


Economist Dick Conway notes that Washington has a very opaque tax system, in which people do not know how much they spend annually. By contrast, people who pay income taxes can track those numbers. The Washington State Department of Revenue says if someone wants to know what they spend in taxes, they would need to track it themselves, as the state does not track it individually.

Conway says that could influence how people vote on tax measures. If they perceive that they are paying a lot, for example, they may vote against taxes.

Are taxes to blame for housing crisis?


"This is a huge issue as it relates to housing and dealing with the issues of those facing homelessness," says Marty Kooistra. He directs the Housing Development Consortium in Seattle.

"From where we sit, this regressive tax issue is a big part of whether we can overcome the crisis that we have."

For one, people paying 17 percent of their income on taxes have less money left over for housing.

The regressive structure also means Washington taxes are low compared to other states, on average. States that tax people based on income bring in higher revenues.

Kooistra says the issue for housing advocates is that they need millions more dollars from cities and the state to build affordable housing. It leaves his group in a pickle: either ask lawmakers to find more money by raising taxes, or come up short on their housing goals.

Correction March 11, 2019, 3:15p.m.: Correction to the agency that oversees taxes in Washington state, which is the Department of Revenue.

Tell Us What You Think

We'd love to hear your thoughts