Outdated FEMA Flood Maps Don't Account For Climate Change | KUOW News and Information

Outdated FEMA Flood Maps Don't Account For Climate Change

Sep 15, 2016
Originally published on September 15, 2016 12:45 pm

The floods that hit Louisiana last month were caused by rainfall that was unlike anything seen there in centuries. Most of the southern part of the state was drenched with up to 2 or 3 inches in an hour. A total of 31 inches fell just northeast of Baton Rouge in about three days; 20 parishes were declared federal disaster areas.

Climate scientists and flood managers suspect there could more like that to come — in Louisiana and in other parts of the country.

There have always been extraordinary rainstorms — storms stronger than anyone can remember. But Nicholas Pinter, a geologist at the University of California, Davis, who researches floods, says we shouldn't write these off as once-in-a-lifetime freak events.

"[In] our experience," Pinter says, "these kind of — call them 'acts of God explanations' — are served up just a little too easily." Sure, he says, amazing rainstorms do happen. But lately, big floods seem to be following storms more often.

"Hundred-year floods — floods of a magnitude that usually occur only once a century — [and] other large [weather] events are occurring bigger and more frequently than the published probabilities predict," Pinter says.

And some of those floods look different.

For example, satellite photos show that about a third of the flooding in Louisiana last month was outside the local flood plain. The flood plain is the area that historically gets inundated by a once-a-century flood.

Pinter says floods that occur outside the historical flood plain appear to be happening more often — in Louisiana and elsewhere.

"Maybe we're seeing a different character of flood event beginning to appear," he says. "More like a climate-driven flash flood event that's affecting these big river systems, which might be a new and different phenomenon that we need to throw into the statistics. Maybe."

A heavy rain, for example, that flashes down onto urban areas and just overwhelms sewers and drains might be this sort of event, he says.

At this point, the evidence that the increasing floods is climate-related is still tentative, because you need a lot of storm data over many years to identify a trend. But Paul Osman, flood plain manager for the state of Illinois, is seeing changes too. Osman studies floods for the state and is charged with figuring out how to prepare for them. He calls these sudden floods that lie outside of flood zones "drainage events."

"We found that 90 percent of our damages in Illinois are not traditional overland flow damages (like a river overflowing its banks)," he says, "but rather heavy rainfall events that cause basements to back-fill with water."

Osman says a 2015 study by Illinois flood authorities found that between 2007 and 2014, almost all the flood damage in urban areas occurred outside the traditional flood plain.

Osman says he suspects that's partly because the region is increasingly covered by concrete — shopping malls, parking lots and other impervious surfaces that lead to flash-flood runoff. But he says he and other flood plain managers are noticing a shift in rainfall patterns, as well.

"There's no doubt," Osman says. "All the scientific evidence points at those rainfalls, [which] are changing. We're having a lot more of these intense, short-duration storms that happen in relatively small geographic areas" — such as the regions recently affected in Louisiana.

That's consistent with what climate scientists have been predicting. A warmer atmosphere holds more water vapor and can create bigger, more intense storms. And the federal government's latest National Climate Assessment notes that average precipitation is up overall in the U.S., and points to particularly intense rainfall events in the Midwest and East.

Osman says many drainage systems can't handle these intense storms. "Most of those storm sewer designs were built on historic records and historic rainfall events that are no longer the case," he says.

If historic rainfall data no longer hold true, that's a problem for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA draws up maps that show where flood plains are. People with federally backed mortgages in the highest risk areas have to get flood insurance. People outside those areas don't.

Kathy Schaefer, an engineer who spent 10 years drawing those maps at FEMA, says those in use now don't take into account any rainfall changes that might have started to take place because of climate change.

"You had to ignore climate change [in drawing the maps]," she says. "All of the mapping had to be based on the existing conditions [at the time they were drawn, or many years earlier]." Those conditions were rainfall and flooding statistics from the past, she explains. Sometimes decades in the past.

Schaefer says local flood managers have begun to suspect that "existing conditions" are changing. But, until recently, anytime they came to Washington, D.C., looking for help to deal with those changes, they had to mince their words.

"They [couldn't] even use the words 'climate change,' " she says. "They call it a 'slow moving disaster,' which is sort of a code word for climate change."

Over the past couple of years, FEMA has begun to consider climate change in its flood analyses, Schaefer says. An executive order from the White House now requires it, and the agency is also proposing new operating procedures that require research into the effects of climate change on flooding.

But there's a time-lag problem: FEMA only updates its insurance flood maps every five years. Climate scientists fear that the weather may be changing faster than that.

Copyright 2016 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Health workers are piecing together a complicated puzzle in El Paso County, Colo. In January, three cities noticed synthetic chemicals in the drinking water known as PFCs. Historically these compounds have been used to make products such as carpets and specific firefighting foam. The Environmental Protection Agency has linked exposure to low birth weights and even forms of cancer. Grace Hood from Colorado Public Radio reports.

GRACE HOOD, BYLINE: In the city of Security south of Colorado Springs, resident Brenda Piontkowski works through her to-do list. There are meals to plan, events with the family and the regular run to a filtered water station.

BRENDA PIONTKOWSKI: The sound of clean water.

HOOD: Piontkowski has visited this water vending station every other day for months because she says water at home isn't safe.

PIONTKOWSKI: All I know is it's not healthy. I can't drink my tap water.

HOOD: That's because her tap water has PFCs - perfluorinated compounds. Most people have been exposed to very small amounts in fabric or cookware, but a few places across the country have elevated levels in drinking water.

The city of Security is one of those spots. The EPA links higher exposure levels to a number of health concerns. This May, the agency made health advisory levels for PFCs more strict.

JOEL BEAUVAIS: These numbers incorporate a margin of protection and would be protective over the course of a lifetime of exposure in drinking water to these levels.

HOOD: Joel Beauvais is with the EPA.

BEAUVAIS: And they would also be protective against the developmental effects that might be associated with short-term exposures during pregnancy or infancy.

HOOD: The EPA has worked since the early 2000s to phase out production of PFCs. Water contamination has been linked to locations where the chemical itself is produced as well as airfields where a specific PFC-laden firefighting foam was used.

In Colorado, health officials say nearby Peterson Air Force Base is one likely source, and they point out further investigation is needed. Daniel Medina has helped coordinate PFC research across the Air Force.

DANIEL MEDINA: It's important for us to study the problem and see where they're located so we spend the future dollars on the right places.

HOOD: Since 2010, the Air Force has spent $137 million to study the scope of the problem. It says nearly 200 installations warrant more in-depth inspections for PFCs. Meantime, the U.S. Department of Defense says it's examining hundreds of other sites for possible contamination.

In the city of Security, Colo., Water and Sanitation District Manager Roy Heald has a different goal. It's drinking water that's 100 percent PFC free.

ROY HEALD: And that's not as easy as you might think. It's not a matter of just flipping a switch and shutting off a well.

HOOD: The city of Security uses a combination of groundwater from wells and surface water from rivers. It's the groundwater that exceeds the EPA advisory. Crews are working hard to make it easier to blend in surface water and improve the infrastructure, but Heald says those projects could cost each person who receives a water bill.

HEALD: This has not affected our rate yet, but unless there is relief from somebody else, it has to.

HOOD: That relief could come from the Air Force itself. Earlier this summer it announced it will spend more than $4 million to help install filtration systems for water districts. And there are plans to phase out the firefighting foam on military bases.

But in Colorado it could take years until studies conclusively decide who's responsible, and that leaves Heald and the city of Security's ratepayers on the hook for now. For NPR News, I'm Grace Hood in Security, Colo. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.